6 tips for writing an acknowledgement letter

Every person in a managerial position eventually reaches a point where they need to compose an acknowledgment letter. These letters are basically a thank you note in which the author recognizes the work of a certain person and expresses their gratitude for it. The only distinction between a traditional thank you note and an acknowledgment letter is that the former focuses on one small event, like organizing a group lunch, whereas the former focuses on something long-term, like a hardworking community service volunteer. It can be difficult, to sum up, something as extensive as this within one letter, so here is some essential guidance in this regard. Stay On One Page While it can be very easy to drone on and on about a person you are especially grateful to, it is important that you restrict yourself to one leaf. Anything more becomes difficult for the recipient to manage and preserve for an extended duration. It can be very helpful to make a rough draft first and then write. This way, you will be able to ensure that you include all important information in the essay without going overboard with the word count. Express Your Feelings Freely As the name suggests, acknowledgment letters ‘acknowledge’ everything that a certain person has done. However, even though it may seem like these letters are a very professional affair, you actually have to be quite sentimental in them. Unlike thank you letters, which are event-driven (you are thanking someone for a certain action), acknowledgment letters are emotion driven (you are expressing your personal feelings and gratitude for a certain person’s work). Therefore, it is actually encouraged that you are not stoic and actually describe your emotions regarding the person’s work. Nevertheless, you should avoid getting melodramatic as well. It is important to strike a balance. Only Bring Up Positive Things The purpose of acknowledgment assignment writing is to praise a person for their hard work. The refore, it would be ironic to discuss their flaws in it. It is likely that you have certain poor opinions about whatever person you are writing this letter for, and might even have bad blood with them, but you cannot ‘acknowledge’ them in this paper. You have to stay positive and express your appreciation for all the good work the subject in question has done. Recall Specific Details You also have to give your paper legitimacy and demonstrate its authenticity. Include specific events, actions, and details that will show precisely why you are appreciating the subject of the letter. This will also show that your opinions are genuine because you can recall these specific actions, and are not simply writing it for the sake of it. Conclude By Highlighting The Consequences As you approach the end of your acknowledgment letter writing, you should mention how the actions and work of the receiving individual have made a considerable positive impact on the organization they were working with. Do not be abstract about this, and clearly show how exactly they left a good influence on the company, and how their effect will be continued to be felt for some time to come. Wish Them Well At the very end of your letter, you should wish the person whom the letter thanks good luck. Express your wish to see them do well, regardless of your actual personal feelings. You should also mention that the person will be a valuable asset to whatever organization or person(s) they will work in the future. As a leader, it is your responsibility to write these letters. These six things are all you need to know to get started on your acknowledgment letter writing.

Eleanor Roosevelts Contributions to Human Rights

Eleanor Roosevelt's Contributions to Human Rights On February 16, 1946, facing the incredible violations of human rights that victims of World War II suffered, the United Nations established a Human Rights Commission, with Eleanor Roosevelt as one of its members. Eleanor Roosevelt had been appointed a delegate to the United Nations by President Harry S. Truman after the death of her husband, President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Eleanor Roosevelt brought to the commission her long commitment to human dignity and compassion, her long experience in politics and lobbying, and her more recent concern for refugees after World War II. She was elected chair of the Commission by its members. Contributions to the Development of the Declaration She worked on a Universal Declaration of Human Rights, writing parts of its text, helping to keep the language direct and clear and focused on human dignity. She also spent many days lobbying American and international leaders, both arguing against opponents and trying to fire up the enthusiasm among those more friendly to the ideas. She described her approach to the project this way: I drive hard and when I get home I will be tired! The men on the Commission will be also! On December 10, 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a resolution endorsing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In her speech before that Assembly, Eleanor Roosevelt said: We stand today at the threshold of a great event both in the life of the United Nations and in the life of mankind. This declaration may well become the international Magna Carta for all men everywhere. We hope its proclamation by the General Assembly will be an event comparable to the proclamation in 1789 [the French Declaration of the Rights of Citizens], the adoption of the Bill of Rights by the people of the US, and the adoption of comparable declarations at different times in other countries. Pride in Her Efforts Eleanor Roosevelt considered her work on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to be her most important accomplishment. Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home- so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person; the neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he attends; the factory, farm, or office where he works. Such are the places where every man, woman, and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world.

Critique of British Prime Ministers attack on the free market Essay

Critique of British Prime Ministers attack on the free market - Essay Example The free market theory postulates that there should be numerous participants within the same market engaged in the buying and selling of numerous and varied products. All such producers have the opportunity to take part in production activities Furthermore, it argues that the ultimate gain is to consumers who enjoy the benefits of increased product diversity as well as competitive and affordable pricing on the same; in that the prevailing prices are a consequence of a â€Å"push and pull† forces of demand versus supply respectively. These ideal conditions of the free market form the basis and support for an economic practice that has become synonymous modern day trade under the banner of capitalism. For perfectly competitive markets, the ideal economics of a â€Å"free market† exist. This was the prevailing economic theory of the period of 1960-80. However, the current trends in economics suggest that big markets hardly operate under perfect competitive conditions since primarily; households are conscious about the markets; producers curve out their market shares therein effectively seeking profit and shutting out other competitors. Most markets in both the UK and the US are not â€Å"free markets† but oligopolies where a few firms control a large portion of the market (Hoetzlein).It is however unfortunate that the ideals of the free market are increasingly been used by politicians and technocrats alike as a rallying cry for free healthcare, reduced taxes, unregulated interest rates and deregulation of the aggregate economy. This has led to the erosion of the very fundamentals designed to optimize welfare to the consuming public of which they claim to be pursuant. The basic argument for the proponents of free market policies is in opposition to governmental interference in business operations and instead in favor of a natural restoration of balance within the economy. The ability and willingness to freely engage in exchange of commodities w ould therefore suffice in creating a natural order within the market that favors all parties involved. It is based on such an understanding that the British Prime Minister, David Cameron faults the previous regimes over their apparent apathy in regard to the exercise of free market policies. The prime minister argues that previous regime’s turbo-capitalism policies have turned a blind eye on corporate excesses plunging the economy into anarchy and violating the fundamental purposes for which it (the government) was formulated. Most apparent under his attacks on previous regimes policy of â€Å"letting capitalism rip† is the impact on oligopolies of necessity goods such as healthcare, utilities and housing. Such are the goods that are most pertinent to the civilian population as they are needed to survive; items with which households are unable to exert price elasticity. He condemns the previous regimes for denying the citizenry the enjoyment of these basic amenities at the expense of corporate greed and profit making. The recent global financial crisis has served to further the underlying weaknesses in the free market theory (Kwak). The world financial crisis is viewed as a banking crisis arising from the uncontrolled and misinformed deregulation of the United States’ financial market. This is because the world’s reserves are largely in the US currency (Roberts). Nowhere else than in the developed countries in Western Europe were the effects of the crisis mostly evidenced. However, most unfortunate is the fact that the role of most hard core free market theorists in this collapse seems to have evoked little or no interest. This further evokes questions to mind as to whether the crisis is over and if the supposed recovery is truly on course? Although many point to